When a government is formed by other means beside a reasonably fair election, it means democracy is really dead.

Some of the Malaysians like to brag that Malaysia’s democracy is already dead when in fact it’s not; but they are perfectly happy to kill the democracy with their own hands. Bloody hypocrites.

If Anwar does have the numbers of MPs to crossover, he should dissolve the parliament and hold another General Election and win it fair and square… I’ll be more than happy to support him to become our next Prime Minister then.

I am not going to approve any other means to form our government besides via a public election… this crossover is going to dampen the basic constitution of the nation, and the damage could be far worse than whatever Malaysia is experiencing now.

Think twice before supporting the idea my fellow Malaysians… don’t be liaison in murdering the country’s democracy.

The patriotic spirit among Malaysian youths is not up to expectation, said Youth and Sports Minister Datuk Ismail Sabri on Saturday. He gave the index on patriotism among youths at only 68.2 per cent as many of them “still questioned the social contract when the country achieved independence.” [Bernama]

So, questioning the social contract means that we are not patriotic? Interesting perception Mr Sabri.

50 years ago we didn’t have internet, mobile phones, Viagra, AIDS, Proton, AirAsia etc. Lots of things have changed over the span of 50 years… and lots of things have become irrelevant. Why are we not supposed to question any contracts or rules that were made 50 years ago?

I was not even born yet back then, and I am not sure if we actually do have a 50-year-old social contract. Why shouldn’t I question the legitimacy as well as the relevance of the contract?

If asking for a fair-for-all-Malaysians policy is considered as unpatriotic, just be it… I don’t want to be a second class patriot.

Datuk Ahmad Said has sworn in as the new Menteri Besar of Terengganu on Sunday (Mar 30) with the support of all 23 state assemblymen, thus putting an end to the mini-crisis over the appointment.

For those who are cheering that the Palace has won the tug-of-war between the Umno central leadership… please think twice of the complications involved.

There are flaws when it comes to appointment of a new MB… it’s a regret that the people would have no final saying of who should be the MB.

Read the rest of this post »

The Election Commission (EC) has scrapped the indelible ink plan for the March 8 general election following legal advice, its chairman Tan Sri Abdul Rashid Abdul Rahman said. He said that the decision made at a meeting today was also to ensure security and public order.

“Police investigations reveal that there are irresponsible people who bought ink from foreign countries in order to persuade those not familiar with the procedure to have the ink applied (to a voter’s forefinger or nail) before polling day,” he told a press conference at the EC headquarters, Putrajaya. [Bernama]

Abdul Rashid also said that the use of indelible ink would not be effective as the country’s constitution allows those who refuse to have their fingernail marked with the ink to still be issued with a ballot, and that the use of the indelible ink could infringe the constitutional right of a voter to cast his vote, especially if the commission tries to bar someone from voting for having an ink marked in his finger. [Malaysiakini]

Read the rest of this post »

Prime Minister and UMNO president Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi opened the UMNO General Assembly on Wednesday (Nov 7) at the Putra World Trade Centre. The following is the full text of his opening address [TheStar]…

STRENGTHENING CONFIDENCE – VENTURING INTO A NEW ERA

Alhamdulillah, with God’s will, we are convene for the 58th UMNO General Assembly.

2. Our assembly this year takes place in the glow of the 50th Merdeka celebrations. This is also our first assembly for the next 50 years. Beginning the first national elections, UMNO, as part of the Alliance and subsequently Barisan Nasional, has formed the national government based on the principle of power sharing. It also spearheaded the drive towards independence.

3. The Malayan Government, considered to be lacking in experience, faced myriad challenges. Twelve years after independence, the nation was riven by racial riots that threatened its survival. Thanks to mutual understanding and a strong spirit of cooperation, we overcame this test. That dark time in our history became a valuable lesson that taught us the need to strengthen our unity.

4. In the aftermath of this tragedy, the Government introduced three major measures. First, the Rukun Negara was introduced as a national ideology to ensure national unity and safeguard the integrity of the nation. Second, the New Economic Policy was designed to develop our economy based on fair and equitable growth. Finally, the Barisan Nasional was introduced as an effective and inclusive political vehicle. The implementation of these three measures has brought success, guaranteed our survival and brought us the prosperity that we enjoy to this day.
Read the rest of this post »

Opening address by former Yang di-Pertuan Agong and former Lord President of the Federal Court, HRH Sultan Azlan Shah, at the 14th Malaysian Law Conference… [Malaysianbar]

“50 Years of Constitutionalism and the Rule of Law”

Assalamaualaikum Warahmatullahi Wabarakatuh.

Salam Sejahtera.

Bismillahi Rahmanir Rahim.

This year marks the 50th year of our nation’s Independence. It is also the 50th year of our Merdeka Constitution.

Malaysia and its people have every reason to celebrate this joyous occasion as the country prospers as a constitutional democracy with a constitutional monarchy in the form as established by the Merdeka Constitution in 1957.

Not all countries that achieved their freedom at the end of the colonial period are today able to celebrate their independence with pride. Some are under military rule, whilst others have had their institutions undermined or even abolished.

The 50th anniversary of our independence is therefore an appropriate moment for all of us to reflect upon the strength of our constitutional system. As we rejoice in our success, It is important to be alert to the pitfalls of failure if proper regard is not given to our constitutional mechanisms.

We must ever be mindful that written constitutions are mere parchment pieces.

It is important that there must be, in the hearts and minds of those who are entrusted to administer and uphold the constitution, a belief in the values and principles that animate the august document.

I had occasion to observe when sitting in the Federal Court in 1977 that the “constitution is not a mere collection of pious platitudes”. I spoke then of the 3 essential features of our constitution. I said:

“It is the supreme law of the land embodying three basic concepts: One of them is that the individual has certain fundamental rights upon which not even the power of the state may encroach.

The second is the distribution of sovereign power between the states and the federation…

The third is that no single man or body shall exercise complete sovereign power, but that it shall be distributed among the executive, legislative and judicial branches of government, compendiously expressed in modern terms that we are a government of laws, not of men.”

The prescription that “we are a government of laws, not of men” describes the basic principle that runs through our entire constitution-the principle of the Rule of Law.

The Rule of Law is the defining feature of democratic government. In delivering the eleventh Tunku Abdul Rahman lecture in November 1984, I again defined it as follows:

“The Rule of Law means literally what it says: The Rule of the law. Taken in its broadest sense this means that people should obey the law and be ruled by it.

But in political and legal theory it has come to be read in a narrow sense, that the government shall be ruled by law and be subject to it.

The ideal of the Rule of Law in this sense is often expressed by the phrase “government by law and not by man””
Read the rest of this post »

The Court of Appeal has ordered the release of the 17-year-old boy convicted of murdering his tuition teacher’s 11-year-old daughter five years ago. [Thestar]

Here is my simple understanding about the situation…

1. The mandatory punishment for conviction for murder in Malaysia is a death penalty…

2. Minors cannot be hanged in Malaysia…

3. There are no specific laws on how to punish a minor convicted for murder in Malaysia (there were some laws but deemed unconstitutional on July 12)…

4. A convicted young murderer who stabbed a girl 20 times is released.

The scariest part is… all minors can kill anyone they like from now on until our lawmakers could come out with something constitutional? (Correct me if I am wrong… I am not a law expert)

Update Oct 24 - teenage murderer went back to jail


RSS and Newsletter


RSS and XML feed
Enter your email address for latest updates

Categories and Topics